Quote:
Originally Posted by peevoyeur09
OK, the video does not have any site copyright so theoretically it could be amateur. IMHO she's a porn actress (based on her "performance") but I don't know her name so she might be amateur. I take this part of my objection back. It's just that I've seen so many porn movies in this amateur forum that I lost patience. But I may be wrong in this case, maybe she's an amateur girl with a strange hobby :-)
|
I agree. It is really thin border between "amateur" and "looks like amateur". I have certain (my own rule) how to differentiate these types.
I truly believe, that video is amateur in this cases:
- when it is selfmade (regardless of the type of camera - if it si phone or great quality camera)
- when there is no some selling website copyright (this does not include e.g. pornhub or so on for me)
- when it is made in really amateur conditions (e.g. friends are recording friend pee in parking lot)
For example, I do not really trust, that most of toilet spy cameras (especially Japan cameras) that these videos are really amateur. It really looks like amateur conditions, but mostly it looks like, that girl should see camera. Especially in case, when it is inside of toilet.
And that girl on video, she is not actually pornstar, but she is quiet experienced, because she earns money as webcam girl. For me, this is amateur content, because because she is not paid by any company to do something, but on the other side she is paid by users watching her to do something.
