CLICK HERE to read FORUM RULES! |
|
|
Thread Tools |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Many "public" areas also aren't. The woods or bushes around a venue are private property. You may be prohibited from filming on private property. Many counties in Europe have similar laws. It is considered a sexual offense in most of the world. And btw, assault doesn't require touching someone, you're thinking of battery. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jessica60700 For This Useful Post: | ||
Lastoneton (02-24-2023) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
By private I meant "closed places" (room etc...) If somebody pees in the garden in full view of everyone near the street, good luck in getting the recording people convicted... a "closed" place is a very important notion in the voyeur legislation, way more than "private" one. What is supposed to be hidden : the limit A voyeur recording a nude girl walking on the streets : no problem A voyeur recording an Underskirt in public place : problem Quote:
Because it's not what I read. I read very often that what's made in public view can be recorded. If many articles I read, the main concern was sharing it, not recording it. Quote:
sexual assault requires touching someone, otherwise it will be other things like "violation of nudity" etc... but not "sexual assault". But it depends from the countries. But I really don't undersstand why you said In most European countries filming a girl peeing in public is sexual assault up to 15 years in prison. In European countries, legislation are complex and not under a single notion of "sexual assault" including pratically everything... it' s not the reality. There are many distinctions made and "sexual recording" have their own articles with their own sentences and I can assure you, it's not to 15 years lol. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cunnijunior For This Useful Post: | ||
at6000 (02-26-2023), Hami85 (07-12-2023), Lastoneton (02-24-2023), observer (02-24-2023), vpw (02-23-2023) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That's what i presumed, there are underground communities that keep the content off the web and amongst themselves only. You probably need your own original content to be invited into these circles. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I think more will come. In the time of Corona there weren't any festivals / public events. And I think the reason that there are so many old videos is, that those are reuploads from paid sites. Some of those sites still produce videos, but until they are reuploaded may take some time.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to json1337 For This Useful Post: | ||
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But a girl trying to hide while peeing is the same as upskirt voyeurism. You know that voyerism is a crime while insisting your particular form of voyeurism isn't. What is the difference between going into a bathroom without a doors and going in an alcove in an alleyway? You go pee just out of sight in both cases, the only difference is that one is inside and the other is outside. So you feel entitled to anything outside? Well then why do you recognize upskirt shots are bad? If I don't wear anything under a skirt? Are you entitled to see my crotch anytime I'm outside? What if I just spread my legs and leg go, then are you entitled to a glimpse? If I go into a half squat, are you entitled then? What if I have a friend hold a screen up to block view. Are you entitled poke your camera around it? What if I'm in a alley, are you entitled to stand right infront of my and hold your camera inches from my crotch? If I'm pulled over on the side of the road, are you entitled to pull up behind me, jump out of your car, run upto me, and hold your camera inches from my crotch? Please tell me how you're entitled to see my vagina. Please explain. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jessica60700 For This Useful Post: | ||
TheAMan (03-01-2023) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Its not so much that people are "entitled" to see you so much as it is you are not "entitled" to privacy. If someone made a physical move on you, or shoved your friend out of the way, that would be considered an assault. There are also decency laws that certain jurisdictions have that would make that filming illegal, but none of it is centered around privacy while in public and willfully removing clothing. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dredrickt For This Useful Post: | ||
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
These anti-voyeur laws don't work because they violate the laws of nature. A men will always look at a woman, maybe some of them will take photos and videos. And we shouldn't judge men for this, just as we don't judge gays and lesbians for their sexual preferences.
__________________
Observer - the Admin of Amateur Voyeur forum. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to observer For This Useful Post: | ||
Cunnijunior (06-25-2023), Hami85 (07-12-2023), Lastoneton (02-27-2023), saugruessel (02-27-2023), vpw (02-27-2023) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
When a woman decides to pee outdoors in a public place, any expectation of privacy becomes an oxymoron. What is expected of a man is discretion and most man till today observe that while their natural instincts make them get a sneak peek at the exposed privates of the peeing woman while making her feel comfortable. Of course there are assholes who harass women during their relief and these jerks are the ones that are basically enabling these foolish laws.
The recent ruling in Spain with regards to taking videos of the peeing ladies basically outlines that if the woman decides to pee outdoors in a public place, she has rights to prevent someone from taking pictures or videos. The best part being that many young ladies were asked if they had any objections to being filmed while they peed and to no surprise most took the mature attitude of not being concerned if their privates are filmed during their pee. They are fully aware of the implications of peeing in public. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to georgewt For This Useful Post: | ||
TheAMan (03-01-2023) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I do not agree, the voyeurists ( and exhibitionists ) is a sexual minority and they always under pressure of different laws. I see no big difference between voyeurists and gay/lesbians who was under pressure of laws is like 15-20 years ago. There is one difference, gay/lesbians won back their rights, but not voyeurists who still under big pressure of descrimination laws and still not have a right to watch...
__________________
Observer - the Admin of Amateur Voyeur forum. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to observer For This Useful Post: | ||
coitus (03-12-2023), Lastoneton (03-01-2023) |
|
|